Blog
How LFP battery aging is different from SLA battery?
12 Feb 2022

Aging is an unavoidable process caused by side reactions present in all electrochemical devices including battery cells. It may result in significant changes of capacity and resistance of a device over time and must, therefore, be considered in the system layout phase (e.g., necessity of over-sizing initial capacity) as well as in the system operation phase (e.g., adapting maximum allowed cell dispatch power).


In fact, in contrast to lesser demanding applications in portable devices, a profitable usage of Lithium iron Phosphate battery in stationary applications requires a detailed understanding and modeling of battery degradation: A long-lasting and demanding application will cause both performance and capacity reduction of the storage system and may significantly affect the overall business case via increased operational cost (OPEX) and particularly high degradation induced replacement cost.


It is common to monitor a battery State of Health (SOH) by an advance BMS to quantify the continued evolution of battery degradation resulting in both capacity fade and internal resistance increase (linked to decreasing peak power performance). The battery remaining capacity can be related to its nominal value derived in new/used state under standard test conditions. Due to transport regulations and application-specific minimum power requirements a replacement indicator SOH replace cap is defined. In automotive, often a SOH replace cap = 0.8 is applied, but for stationary applications and particularly in the context of second-life concepts lower values have been proposed.


Despite being studied for many years with continued effort we know that LFP life time is much more superior to VRLA, but still understanding and modeling the lifetime of LFP is a field of continued research.


In a challenging environment, if the user doesn't follow the operating instruction from the manufacturer, or if the battery and BMS quality is not up to the mark, then various degradation mechanisms including electrolyte decomposition, passive film formation, particle cracking, and active material dissolution can be individually addressed on the material and battery cell level often leading to increased resistance, reduced capacity retention and/or an increased risk of an unsafe battery state.


Conventional analysis and modelling approaches are based on extensive battery tests and derive empirical models often compatible with an Equivalent Circuit Model (ECM) approach for system performance determination. With an improved understanding of the cell-internal loss mechanisms, an increasing number of semi-empirical and physical models have been developed and successfully used for cell modelling. Recently, non-empirical Physical-Chemical Models (PCM) has gained increasing interest. Despite the usage of PCM models for aging prediction may allow giving a more detailed insight to cell internal loss mechanisms and how to circumvent these, it remains most challenging to find a valid parameterization of such models and to scale the cell internal models to the application relevant level of a full battery system.


With increasing capabilities of data logging and data management, data-driven approaches on the storage system level have also gained increasing interest recently. Despite improved capabilities of these emerging approaches, it is still believed, that for simulations of the aging behaviour of a full


LFP battery storage system or an automotive battery pack high accuracy of a single battery cell model is essential. The different approaches show individual strength and drawbacks, and below table summarize some indicators for comparison at a short glance.


Approach

Strengths

Challenges

Physical-Chemical Models (PCM)

High precision Understanding of internal mechanisms

High computational effort Parameterization challenging

Empirical and Semi-Empirical Models

Acceptable accuracy Low computational effort

Limited insight to cell internal degradation

Analytic Models and Data-Driven Approaches

Direct modeling on pack level feasible

Large quantity of data necessary


EverExceed LFP batteries are made using the most advanced technology and with precise testing. Also the integrated advanced user friendly BMS helps to restore and analyze the SOH, SOC and other information of the battery besides protecting it from all kind of risks and failures. It keeps the aging of the battery checked to provide you reliable operation.


*This article is from internet, does not represent the views of this site, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.

EverExceed has vast experience when it comes to battery solutions, and we are satisfying our partners' and customers’ pain points with the most efficient and precise state of art battery packs consistently. If you have any requirements or any kind of query regarding the battery & power solutions, feel free to communicate with our dedicated team at any time at marketing@everexceed.com

Are you looking for more information about EverExceed's  professional products and solutions?  Our expert team is always here to help. Please fill in the form and our sales representative will contact you shortly. EverExceed | Empower, Energize, Exceed the Energy you Expect forever.
copyright © 2024 EverExceed Industrial Co., Ltd.all rights reserved.
leave a message
welcome to everexceed
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

home

products

about

contact